Artist: Driftless Pony Club
Album: BuckminsterYear: 2011
Length: 30 minutes, 8 seconds
Genre: Indie Rock
Why I picked it up: Originally fan of wheezywaiter, now also fan of the DPC
Favourite tracks: House of 1982 Built Like a Ship, El Cid III
Random lyric: I don't know what I am/But I'm not a category
Purchase:
Preorder physical copy, get instant digital download
I have just discovered this is the first thing that pops up when you google 'driftless pony club review buckminster'...I was looking for other early reviews, okay? Tom Milsom's comes up
after this and my opinion isn't going to be nearly as well thought out at his 'cause that's not what I do. (If you're new here, please click the 'about' tab up there. Also, click
here to read Tom's review.) It makes me nervous to write anything. Perhaps I could tell you just to go buy it and support a very good indie rock band? No, I suppose that won't cut it. Here goes.
Actually, the problem is, before I even started to feel nervous about writing this, that I just don't know what to say. I can't put my finger on DPC, I can never figure out how to describe how or why I like the band. I know I like the music. I know this is a very good album. Some of the songs are very very good and I listen to them on repeat lots. I like Craig's voice and I like the use of guitar and I like all the fiddly bits. I don't love this album. I do, however, like it very much and it is a very enjoyable listen and definitely worth your money.
But really, I still haven't said anything. Perhaps I'll pick apart Tom's review and tell you what I agree and disagree with. (Blockquotes from Tom's review).
In 2009 Driftless Pony Club released Expert, a collection of six songs that did nothing but highlight the strongest traits of this band. Adolescent guitars swarmed under lyrics exquisitely close to making sense, often building to windswept climaxes that left anyone paying attention tantalisingly close to understanding what they’d been shouted at about. The words and sentences made sense on their own, but were tightly knitted together into something hazy and dreamlike. It was an EP that captured fragments of moods and moments and, regardless of context, managed to portray them with a glorious clarity and emotion.
Tom goes on to say Buckminster 'wisely builds on a lot of [these] things' and I whole-heartedly agree. Well said. It's good there are people far more eloquent than I am in this world. Tom then goes on to discuss that the lyrical details of the album are its downfall (too strong a word!! but I can't think of a different one...). The album is about Buckminster Fuller and that probably says it all there. Not a lot of people know a lot of things about the man who invented the geodeisic dome (that's about all I knew of him before this album and now that I've checked out his Wiki page, he didn't actually invent it but popularised and patented the design). Tom summarizes his review with this:
Perhaps I’m overthinking it. Perhaps it works far better as an album for those who have no idea this guy is a real person, and just think that Dymaxion Chronofile is a funny bunch of syllables that don’t bear much thinking about. I just feel like there’s a whole other side to this incredibly rich and well-realised album that can only be unlocked by having a good read of Buckminster Fuller’s wikipedia page, and doing that has the unfortunate side-effect of rendering sections of it disappointing. It’s a quantum album; there are two sides to it that are impossible to see at the same time, one hazily surrealistic to Expert levels and beyond, the other a detailed and well-assembled document of a fascinating man’s life. It’s just a shame that they never quite mesh to become the phenomenal album Buckminster occasionally hints at having the potential to be.
I sort of kind of not really somewhat agree with Tom on this. (That's helpful, isn't it?). I agree that there are two sides to this album, the two he describes. I disagree mostly that those two sides can't mesh. I have now looked over Buckminster's Wikipedia page and I still enjoy the album and still like listening to it. I do have the feeling that I had to have an inside joke or some intelligent comment explained to me. But that doesn't make the album sound any worse.
I also agree that maybe he (and now I) was overthinking it. This is musically a very good album and since it is music, I think in the end that's all that matters (in this case, under these circumstances, etc. etc.). We, the listeners, shouldn't have to become overly concerned with the reality of the lyric subject matter.
...
Well, what an useless post. The worst 'review' I've ever written (I'm so bad at expressing myself -.-) and it'll probably get the mosts views...Oh well :/ I hope some of what I tried to say make sense, I've never written something like this before! And, quite honestly, now I'm starting to understand just a tiny bit how Tom must have felt when he tweeted 'I've just realised that writing and putting up an even slightly negative review of a friend's album is a massive dick move.' I don't agree that it was a dick move, but I feel kind of bad saying anything negative. It's a good album! Really! Go buy it and enjoy :)